4.5 Article

Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1152-1160

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.120

关键词

array analysis; de novo translocation; de novo inversion; complex chromosome rearrangement; microdeletion; microduplication

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [ZonMW 917-86-319]
  2. Brain Foundation of the Netherlands (Hersenstichting) (BdV)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resolution genome-wide array analysis enables detailed screening for cryptic and submicroscopic imbalances of microscopically balanced de novo rearrangements in patients with developmental delay and/or congenital abnormalities. In this report, we added the results of genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients to data on 117 patients from seven other studies. A chromosome imbalance was detected in 37% of all patients with two-breakpoint rearrangements. In 49% of these patients, the imbalances were located in one or both breakpoint regions. Imbalances were more frequently (90%) found in complex rearrangements, with the majority (81%) having deletions in the breakpoint regions. The size of our own cohort enabled us to relate the presence of an imbalance to the clinical features of the patients by using a scoring system, the De Vries criteria, that indicates the complexity of the phenotype. The median De Vries score was significantly higher (P=0.002) in those patients with an imbalance (5, range 1-9) than in patients with a normal array result (3, range 0-7). This study provides accurate percentages of cryptic imbalances that can be detected by genome-wide array analysis in simple and complex de novo microscopically balanced chromosome rearrangements and confirms that these imbalances are more likely to occur in patients with a complex phenotype. European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 1152-1160; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.120; published online 29 June 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据