4.5 Article

European admixture on the Micronesian island of Kosrae: lessons from complete genetic information

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 309-316

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.180

关键词

admixture; haplotype; population genetics; mitochondria; Y chromosome; Oceania

资金

  1. NIH [5 U54 CA121852]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA121852] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The architecture of natural variation present in a contemporary population is a result of multiple population genetic forces, including population bottleneck and expansion, selection, drift, and admixture. We seek to untangle the contribution of admixture to genetic diversity on the Micronesian island of Kosrae. Toward this goal, we used a complete genetic approach by combining a dense genome-wide map of 100 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with data from uniparental markers from the mitochondrial genome and the nonrecombining portion of the Y chromosome. These markers were typed in similar to 3200 individuals from Kosrae, representing 80% of the adult population of the island. We developed novel software that uses SNP data to delineate ancestry for individual segments of the genome. Through this analysis, we determined that 39% of Kosraens have some European ancestry. However, the vast majority of admixed individuals (77%) have European alleles spanning less than 10% of their genomes. Data from uniparental markers show most of this admixture to be male, introduced in the late nineteenth century. Furthermore, pedigree analysis shows that the majority of European admixture on Kosrae is because of the contribution of one individual. This approach shows the benefit of combining information from autosomal and uniparental polymorphisms and provides new methodology for determining ancestry in a population. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 309-316; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.180; published online 21 October 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据