4.5 Article

High-resolution SNP arrays in mental retardation diagnostics: how much do we gain?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 178-185

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.154

关键词

mental retardation; pathogenic CNVs; SNP array; GeneChip 6.0

资金

  1. PA Department of Health [SAP4100026302]
  2. NIH [HL-69256]
  3. Cardeza Foundation for Hematological Research (Philadelphia, PA)
  4. Kimmel Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA)
  5. Italian NIH [526D/28]
  6. Italian Ministry of Health [RC2008-2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used Affymetrix 6.0 GeneChip SNP arrays to characterize copy number variations (CNVs) in a cohort of 70 patients previously characterized on lower-density oligonucleotide arrays affected by idiopathic mental retardation and dysmorphic features. The SNP array platform includes similar to 900 000 SNP probes and 900 000 non-SNP oligonucleotide probes at an average distance of 0.7 Kb, which facilitates coverage of the whole genome, including coding and noncoding regions. The high density of probes is critical for detecting small CNVs, but it can lead to data interpretation problems. To reduce the number of false positives, parameters were set to consider only imbalances 475 Kb encompassing at least 80 probe sets. The higher resolution of the SNP array platform confirmed the increased ability to detect small CNVs, although more than 80% of these CNVs overlapped to copy number 'neutral' polymorphism regions and 4.4% of them did not contain known genes. In our cohort of 70 patients, of the 51 previously evaluated as 'normal' on the Agilent 44K array, the SNP array platform disclosed six additional CNV changes, including three in three patients, which may be pathogenic. This suggests that about 6% of individuals classified as 'normal' using the lower-density oligonucleotide array could be found to be affected by a genomic disorder when evaluated with the higher-density microarray platforms. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 178-185; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.154; published online 7 October 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据