4.5 Article

The PDGF-C regulatory region SNP rs28999109 decreases promoter transcriptional activity and is associated with CL/P

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 774-784

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.245

关键词

PDGF-C; SNP; CL/P; promoter activity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-DE09886, R01-DE012472, R37-DE08559, R01-DE016148, R01-DE014667, P50-DE016215, N01-HG-65403]
  2. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [Z01-DE000711]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human linkage and association studies suggest a gene(s) for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) on chromosome 4q31-q32 at or near the platelet-derived growth factor-C (PDGF-C) locus. The mouse Pdgfc(-/-) knockout shows that PDGF-C is essential for palatogenesis. To evaluate the role of PDGF-C in human clefting, we performed sequence analysis and SNP genotyping using 1048 multiplex CL/P families and 1000 case-control samples from multiple geographic origins. No coding region mutations were identified, but a novel -986 C>T SNP (rs28999109) was significantly associated with CL/P (P=0.01) in cases from Chinese families yielding evidence of linkage to 4q31-q32. Significant or near-significant association was also seen for this and several other PDGF-C SNPs in families from the United States, Spain, India, Turkey, China, and Colombia, whereas no association was seen in families from the Philippines, and Guatemala, and case-controls from Brazil. The -986T allele abolished six overlapping potential transcription regulatory motifs. Transfection assays of PDGF-C promoter reporter constructs show that the -986T allele is associated with a significant decrease (up to 80%) of PDGF-C gene promoter activity. This functional polymorphism acting on a susceptible genetic background may represent a component of human CL/P etiology. European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 774-784; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.245; published online 17 December 2008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据