4.5 Article

Effect of oral digoxin in high-risk heart failure patients: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the DIG trial

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 551-559

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft010

关键词

Digoxin; Heart Failure; High risk; Morbidity; Mortality

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. Bayer
  3. Corthera
  4. Daiichi Sankyo
  5. Novartis
  6. Servier
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10227] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial, digoxin reduced mortality or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) in several pre-specified high-risk subgroups of HF patients, but data on protocol-specified 2-year outcomes were not presented. In the current study, we examined the effect of digoxin on HF death or HF hospitalization and all-cause death or all-cause hospitalization in high-risk subgroups during the protocol-specified 2 years of post-randomization follow-up. In the DIG trial, 6800 ambulatory patients with chronic HF, normal sinus rhythm, and LVEF 45 (mean age 64 years, 26 women, 17 non-whites) were randomized to receive digoxin or placebo. The three high-risk groups were defined as NYHA class IIIIV symptoms (n 2223), LVEF 25 (n 2256), and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) 55 (n 2345). In all three high-risk subgroups, compared with patients in the placebo group, those in the digoxin group had a significant reduction in the risk of the 2-year composite endpoint of HF mortality or HF hospitalization: NYHA IIIIV [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65; 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.570.75; P 0.001], LVEF 25 (HR 0.61; 95 CI 0.530.71; P 0.001), and CTR 55 (HR 0.65; 95 CI 0.570.75; P 0.001). Digoxin-associated HRs (95 CI) for 2-year all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization for subgroups with NYHA IIIIV, LVEF 25, and CTR 55 were 0.88 (0.800.97; P 0.012), 0.84 (0.760.93; P 0.001), and 0.85 (0.770.94; P 0.002), respectively. Digoxin improves outcomes in chronic HF patients with NYHA class IIIIV, LVEF 25, or CTR 55, and should be considered in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据