4.5 Article

Phase I Trial of Active Specific Immunotherapy with Autologous Dendritic Cells Pulsed With Autologous Irradiated Tumor Stem Cells in Hepatitis B- positive Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 111, 期 7, 页码 862-867

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23897

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatitis B; dendritic cell vaccine; tumor stem cells; therapeutic cancer vaccines

资金

  1. NeoStem, Inc., New York, NY and Irvine, CA, USA
  2. Cellular Biomedicine Group, Shanghai, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectivesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis-B or -C viruses. Active specific immunotherapy (ASI) with autologous dendritic cells (DC) presenting antigens from autologous tumor stem cell (TC) lines is associated with promising long-term survival in metastatic cancer, but hepatitis patients were excluded. ASI might benefit high-risk primary HCC patients following surgical resection, but first it is important to show that ASI does not exacerbate hepatitis. MethodsPreviously untreated HCC patients with a solitary lesion >5cm, or three lesions with at least one >3cm, or more than three lesions, underwent surgical resection from which autologous TC lines were established. Irradiated TC were incubated with autologous DC to create DC-TC. After one course of trans-arterial chemoembolization therapy (TACE), three weekly subcutaneous injections of DC-TC suspended in granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor were administered. Patients were monitored for eight weeks. ResultsHCC cell lines were established within five weeks for 15/15 patients. Eight patients, all with chronic hepatitis B, were treated. There was no increase in hepatic transaminases, hepatitis B antigens, or viral DNA. ConclusionAutologous DC-TC did not exacerbate HBV in these HCC patients. A phase II efficacy trial is being planned. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:862-867. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据