4.5 Article

Inhibition of platelet activation in rats with severe congestive heart failure by a novel endothelial nitric oxide synthase transcription enhancer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 336-341

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp005

关键词

Heart failure; Platelets; Infarction; Nitric oxide; Endothelial function

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB355, B10/C3/C8]
  2. Sanofi-Aventis, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased risk of thrombo-embolic events in congestive heart failure (CHF) has been attributed to a hypercoagulable state including vascular endothelial dysfunction and reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) as well as platelet activation. We investigated whether treatment with a novel endothelial NO synthase (eNOS)-transcription enhancer positively modulates systemic NO bioavailability and reduces platelet activation in rats with CHF. After experimental myocardial infarction, male Wistar rats were treated with either placebo or the eNOS-transcription enhancer, AVE9488 (25 ppm/day) for 10 weeks. In rats with severe CHF (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure > 15 mmHg), platelet vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-phosphorylation reflecting the integrity of the NO/cGMP pathway was significantly reduced (mean immunofluorescence at Ser(157): Sham, 61.4 +/- 9.1; CHF-Placebo, 37.4 +/- 4.9; P < 0.05; Ser(239): Sham, 18.1 +/- 2.5; CHF-Placebo, 13.2 +/- 0.6; P < 0.05). Platelet surface expression of P-selectin and glycoprotein 53 were increased in CHF rats compared with sham-operated animals. Chronic treatment with AVE9488 significantly enhanced platelet VASP-phosphorylation in CHF rats (Ser(157): 70.4 +/- 16.2; Ser(239): 19.3 +/- 1.8). In parallel, platelet surface expression of P-selectin and glycoprotein 53 was reduced in the treatment group. Platelet activation was evident in CHF rats. Therapy with the eNOS-transcription enhancer, AVE9488, reduced platelet activation in parallel to normalization of platelet NO bioavailability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据