4.2 Article

Depletion of l-ascorbic acid alternating with its supplementation in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 108-118

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01252.x

关键词

cancer; clonogenic assay; vitamin C

资金

  1. NCI/USDHHS [RO1 CA20717]
  2. Research Career Development Award [KO4 CA00534]
  3. Jin Yang and Huons Pharmaceutical companies
  4. Kyunggi High School 51st Alumni Cancer Research Support Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: l-ascorbic acid (LAA) modifies the in vitro growth of leukemic cells from similar to 50% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). To test the hypothesis that depletion of LAA, alternating with supplementation to prevent scurvy, would provide therapeutic benefit, a single-arm pilot trial was conducted (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00329498). Experimental results: During depletion phase, patients with refractory AML or MDS were placed on a diet deficient in LAA; during supplementation phase, patients received daily intravenous administration of LAA. An in vitro assay was performed pretherapy for LAA sensitivity of leukemic cells from individual patients. Results: Of 18 patients enrolled, eight of 16 evaluable patients demonstrated a clinical response. Responses were obtained during depletion (four patients) as well as during supplementation (five patients) but at a pharmacologic plasma level achievable only with intravenous administration. Of nine patients for whom the in vitro assay indicated their leukemic cells were sensitive to LAA, seven exhibited a clinical response; compared with none of six patients who were insensitive to LAA. Conclusions: The clinical benefit, along with a conspicuous absence of significant adverse events, suggests that further testing of LAA depletion alternating with pharmacologic dose intravenous supplementation in patients with these and other malignancies is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据