4.2 Article

High serum YKL-40 concentration is associated with severe bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 310-317

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.01027.x

关键词

multiple myeloma; bone disease; YKL-40; chitinase 3-like 1; human cartilage glycoprotein-39

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: In multiple myeloma (MM) YKL-40 is present in the bone marrow microenvironment and is suggested to play a role in remodelling of the extracellular matrix. Here, the association between serum YKL-40 and severity of bone disease in MM is investigated. Methods: Serum YKL-40 was measured in 34 MM patients at diagnosis. Bone disease was assessed by radiography and biochemical markers of bone metabolism. Patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy and followed for up to 30 months. Results: Patients with a serum YKL-40 elevated above the age specific reference range (56%) had a higher total X-ray score (P = 0.003) and higher levels of the markers of bone resorption serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (P = 0.003), urine pyridinoline (P = 0.04) and urine deoxypyridinoline (P = 0.002), while the levels of urine N-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (NTX-1) and the markers of bone formation equalled those seen in patients with a normal serum YKL-40. Serum YKL-40 level (beta = 7.6; P = 0.002) and urine NTX-1 (log(2)) (beta = 3.5; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of total X-ray score at diagnosis. Patients with elevated serum YKL-40 at diagnosis had shorter time to first osteolytic event compared to patients with normal serum YKL-40 (12 months vs. not reached; Log rank test: P = 0.03). Conclusion: Newly diagnosed MM patients with elevated serum concentrations of YKL-40 have more severe bone destruction including increased bone resorptive activity and shorter time to progression of bone disease. At this point, a potential role for YKL-40 in myeloma-related bone disease must be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据