4.2 Article

Homoharringtonine affects the JAK2-STAT5 signal pathway through alteration of protein tyrosine kinase phosphorylation in acute myeloid leukemia cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 259-266

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01116.x

关键词

HHT; JAK2-STAT5; phosphorylation; protein tyrosine kinase; acute myeloid leukemia

资金

  1. Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02A405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Homoharringtonine (HHT) was efficient in therapying patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in China, but little is known about the mechanism of its action. As the abnormal activation of JAK2 associated pathway is important to AML, we try to explore the effect of HHT on JAK2-STAT pathway in AML cells, thus supplying theoretical basis for wider use of HHT. Methods: The cell viability was tested by MTT. Apoptosis was tested by flow cytometry. RT-PCR was used to measure the expression of JAK2, STAT5 and the effect gene Bcl-xL. The signal proteins such as p-JAK2, p-STAT5, p-AKT, p-ERK activated by abnormal activated JAK2 were tested by Western blotting. Results: HHT obviously inhibited the viability of primary AML cells and AML cell lines HEL, K562 and HL-60 cells, AnnexinV-PI double staining confirmed early apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. In immunoblotting analysis, when AML cells were affected by HHT for 6 h (much ahead of the time when apoptosis could be induced). The expressions of p-JAK2, p-STAT5, and p-AKT were down-regulated, while the total JAK2, STAT5 and AKT protein levels were stable. There were no changes in p-ERK and BcL-xL proteins. When it prolonged to 24 h, Bcl-xL decreased obviously. Similar results were obtained by using JAK2 specific inhibitor AG490. Conclusions: HHT possibly acts as a broad-spectrum PTK inhibitor and inhibits the phosphorylation of the signal proteins caused by oncogenic proteins such as JAK2V617F, BCR/ABL, thus blocking the survival and proliferative signal pathway of malignant cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据