4.3 Article

Tropical calcific pancreatitis and its association with CTRC and SPINK1 (p.N34S) variants

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832183cf

关键词

Chymotrypsinogen C; SPINK1; tropical calcific pancreatitis; trypsinogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Tropical calcific pancreatitis (TCP) is a relatively common form of chronic pancreatitis in parts of Asia and Africa. The SPINK1 variant p.N34S is strongly associated with TCP, but other genetic factors remain to be defined. Chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) degrades trypsinogen and loss-of-function variants have been found in European patients with chronic pancreatitis. Preliminary data indicate that CTRC might increase the risk for TCP. Materials and methods We selected 150 Indian TCP patients and 150 Indian controls to perform mutational screening of the complete coding region of CTRC and exon 3 of SPINK1. We performed in-silico analysis and functional studies of novel CTRC variants. Results We identified eight variants among this sample. Three were synonymous and c.180 C>T was significantly enriched in patients (odds ratio=2.09; 95% confidence interval=1.19-3.67; P=0.03). We identified a novel nonsynonymous CTRC (p.G61R) variant in one of 146 patients (0.7%), but absent from controls. In-silico analysis showed that this variant affected a conserved residue, and functional analysis showed that p.G61R results in a complete loss of CTRC secretion from transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293T cells. SPINK1 p.N34S was present in 31.8% of patients compared with 4.7% in controls, there was no significant cosegregation with CTRC variants. Conclusion The contribution of CTRC variants to TCP is relatively small, but the identification of novel loss-of-function variants (p.G61R) underscores the importance of the trypsinogen pathway in causing TCP. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:889-894 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据