4.4 Article

Growth patterns and sensitivity to climate predict silver fir decline in the Spanish Pyrenees

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 1001-1012

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-011-0572-7

关键词

Abies alba; Basal-area increment; Climate warming; Drought; Dynamic factor analysis; Tree decline

类别

资金

  1. INIA, Spain [RTA01-071-C3-1]
  2. Gob. Aragon
  3. ARAID
  4. ETH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patterns in radial growth have often been used to predict forest decline since they are regarded as indicators of the tree responses to long-term stressors. However, the sensitivity of tree growth to climate, as a proxy of the trees' adaptive capacity to short-term climatic stress, has received less attention. Here, we used retrospective tree-ring analyses to determine whether growth patterns and sensitivity to climate are related to (silver fir) decline in the Spanish Pyrenees. We used regional climatic data to calculate normalised temperatures and drought indexes. Basal-area increment (BAI) was measured for declining (defoliation > 50%) and non-declining (defoliation < 50%) silver firs in four stands with contrasting decline levels. A dynamic factor analysis (DFA) was applied to test the hypothesis that declining and non-declining trees have experienced different long-term growth trends. Growth sensitivity to climate was computed as the average change in BAI per unit of change in a given climate variable. Declining trees showed a negative growth trend during the last 20 years. Trees with lower relative BAI and negative BAI trends showed stronger growth sensitivity to climate and higher defoliation than trees with the opposite characteristics. Our findings underscore the idea that long-term climatic warming seems to be a major driving factor of growth decline in Pyrenean silver fir forests. Ongoing growth reduction and enhanced growth sensitivity to climate may promote vegetation shifts in these declining forests located near the xeric edge of the species distribution area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据