4.4 Article

Influence of stand, site and meteorological variables on the maximum leaf area index of beech, oak and Scots pine

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 283-295

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-011-0500-x

关键词

Fagus sylvatica; Quercus robin-Pin; sylvestris; Productivity; LAI; Model

类别

资金

  1. Flemish Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) [060032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different multiple linear regression models of maximum leaf area index (LAI(max)) based on stand characteristics, site quality, meteorological variables and their combinations were constructed and cross-validated for three economically important tree species in Flanders, Belgium: European beech (Fagus,vylvatica L.), Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The models were successfully tested on similar datasets of experimental sites across Europe. For each species, ten homogeneous and mature stands were selected, covering the species' entire stand productivity range based on an a priori site index classification. LAI(max) was derived from measurements of leaf area index (LAI) made by means of hemispherical digital photography over the whole growing season (mid-April till end October 2008). Speciesspecific models of LAI(max) for beech and oak were mostly driven by management practice affecting stand characteristics and tree growth. Tree density and dominant height were main predictors for beech, while stand age and treering growth were important in the oak models. Scots pine models were more affected by site quality and meteorological variables. The beech meteorological model showed very good agreement with LAI at several European sites. Scots pine's stand model predicted well LAI across Europe. Since the species-specific models did not share common predictors, generic models of LAI(max) were developed for the 30 studied sites. Dominant height was found to be the best predictor in those generic models. As expected, they showed a lower predictive performance than speciesspecific ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据