4.4 Article

Ozone affects shikimate pathway transcripts and monomeric lignin composition in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 109-116

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-008-0216-8

关键词

European beech; Gene expression; Lignin; Ozone; Shikimate pathway; Transcript

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shikimate pathway plays a pivotal role in the formation of aromatic secondary compounds in plants. It finally leads to the formation of, for example, stilbenes, flavonoids, and lignins. Ozone effects on transcript levels of the shikimate pathway were studied in leaves of European beech saplings in the greenhouse (300 nl l(-1), 8 h/day, 30 days), and in leaves of adult beech trees at the Kranzberg Forest free-air ozone fumigation site (ambient and twice ambient ozone levels) between June and October 2004. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) with RNA isolated from beech saplings showed a strong induction of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase3 (DAHPS3), 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase/shikimate dehydrogenase (DHQD/SD), 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), and chorismate mutase (CM) starting at day seven from the onset of ozone treatment. In contrast, sun leaves of adult European beech showed only a weak elevation of shikimate pathway transcripts throughout the vegetation period studied. In addition, we examined lignin content and monomeric structure in leaves of European beech saplings from the greenhouse experiment. Leaves exhibiting highest amount of ozone-dependent lesions had the highest lignin content as determined according to Klason. Moreover, with increasing leaf damage, the syringyl (S) monomer content decreased, whereas the content of guaiacyl (G) and p-hydroxyphenyl (H) units increased. These results overall suggest that the composition of lignin is affected by ozone and is already regulated at early steps of the shikimate pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据