4.6 Article

Obesity measures and risk of venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 821-830

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-014-9950-z

关键词

Obesity; Venous thromboembolism; Myocardial infarction; Metabolic syndrome x

资金

  1. K.G. Jebsen Foundation
  2. Northern Norway Regional Health Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity is a risk factor for arterial and venous thromboembolism. However, it is not known whether obesity mediates risk through shared mechanisms. In a population-based cohort, we aimed to compare the impact of obesity measures on risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and myocardial infarction (MI), and explore how obesity-related atherosclerotic risk factors influenced these relationships. Measures of body composition including body mass index , waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were registered in 6,708 subjects aged 25-84 years, who participated in the Tromso Study (1994-1995). Incident VTE- and MI-events were registered until January 1, 2011. There were 288 VTEs and 925 MIs during a median of 15.7 years of follow-up. All obesity measures were related to risk of VTE. In linear models, WC showed the highest risk estimates in both genders. In categorized models (highest versus lowest quintile), WC showed highest risk in men (HR 3.59; 95 % CI 1.82-7.06) and HC in women (HR 2.27; 95 % CI 1.54-4.92). Contrary, WHR and WHtR yielded the highest risk estimates for MI. The HR of MI (highest vs. lowest quintile) for WHR was 2.11 (95 % CI 1.59-2.81) in men and 1.62 (95 % CI 1.13-2.31) in women. The risk estimates for MI were substantially attenuated after adjustment for atherosclerotic risk factors, whereas the estimates for VTE remained unchanged. Our findings suggest that the impact of body fat distribution, and the causal pathway, differs for the association between obesity and arterial and venous thrombosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据