4.6 Article

Influenza H1N1 vaccination and adverse pregnancy outcome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 579-588

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-013-9813-z

关键词

Child; H1N1; Immunization; Influenza; Small-for-gestational-age; Pregnancy; Preterm birth; Vaccination

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Medicine)
  2. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although vaccines against influenza can reduce maternal morbidity and mortality, large-scale data on adverse effects in the offspring are scarce. Historical cohort study in Stockholm County, Sweden. We linked H1N1 vaccination data (Pandemrix(A (R)), a mono-valent AS03 adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine) with pregnancy and birth data from 21,087 women with singleton offspring conceived between February 2009 and January 2010 (vaccinated during pregnancy: n = 13,297 vs. unvaccinated: n = 7,790). Data were analysed by conceptualizing the observational cohort as a series of nested cohorts defined at each week of gestation. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) for low birth weight (LBW, < 2,500 g), preterm birth (< 37 completed weeks), small-for-gestational age (SGA, < 10th percentile of the gestational age-specific birth weight within the cohort), low 5-min Apgar score (< 7), and caesarean section. Data were adjusted for potential confounders, including maternal age, body mass index, smoking, parity, civil status and comorbidities. Compared with infants of non-vaccinated women, infants of vaccinated women had similar adjusted ORs (95 % CI) for LBW (0.91; 0.79-1.04), preterm birth (0.99; 0.89-1.10), SGA (0.97; 0.90-1.05), low Apgar score (1.05, 0.84-1.31), and a marginal risk reduction for caesarean section (0.94, 0.89-0.99). H1N1 vaccination during pregnancy, using an AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, does not appear to adversely influence offspring risks of LBW, preterm birth, SGA, or low Apgar score. Our results suggest that this vaccine is safe for the offspring when used in different stages of pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据