4.6 Article

History of allergic disease and epilepsy and risk of glioma and meningioma (INTERPHONE study group, Germany)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 433-440

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9355-6

关键词

Allergy; Asthma; Epilepsy; Hay fever; Eczema; Glioma; Meningioma; Brain tumour; Case control study

资金

  1. Quality of Life and Management of living Resources [QLK4-CT-19999-01563]
  2. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nuclear Safety, and Nature Protection
  3. Ministry for the Environment and Traffic of the state of Baden-Wurttemberg
  4. Ministry for the Environment of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia
  5. MAIFOR Program of the University of Mainz
  6. International Union against Cancer (UICC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present analysis was to examine the association of a medical history of asthma, hay fever, eczema, or epilepsy with the risk of glioma and meningioma. Data of a German population-based case-control study included 381 meningioma cases, 366 glioma cases, and 1,494 controls. Participants' histories of asthma, hay fever, eczema, and epilepsy and the respective ages at onset were asked during a personal interview. A small inverse association between allergic condition and both glioma (odds ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.70-1.22) and meningioma (odd ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.66-1.14) was found. For glioma, this inverse association was more pronounced in persons reporting to have asthma compared to other allergic conditions. The positive association between epilepsy and particularly glioma suggests that epilepsy is an early symptom of the disease. As the association was seen also for epilepsies occurring more than a decade before the diagnosis of glioma, this might indicate either an aetiological role of epilepsy, or a relatively long preclinical phase. In conclusion our study confirms previous findings of case control studies but not those from cohort studies. However, possible selection bias in case control studies might not explain the different results in its entirety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据