4.6 Article

Vitamin D deficiency is not associated with early stages of thyroid autoimmunity

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 167, 期 1, 页码 43-48

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-12-0048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Section/Board of Endocrinology of the UEMS (European Union of Medical Specialists)
  2. Novo Nordisk A/S

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Vitamin D deficiency has been identified as a risk factor for a number of autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Objective: We hypothesized that low levels of vitamin D are related to the early stages of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Design: Two case-control studies were performed. In the cross-sectional study A, euthyroid subjects with genetic susceptibility for AITD but without thyroid antibodies were compared with controls. Cases were subjects from the Amsterdam AITD cohort (euthyroid women who had first- or second-degree relatives with overt AITD) who at baseline had normal TSH and no thyroid antibodies; controls were healthy women examined at the same period. In the longitudinal study B, subjects who developed de novo thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPO-Ab) were compared with those who did not. Cases and controls were subjects from the Amsterdam AITD cohort who at baseline had normal TSH and no thyroid antibodies and during follow-up developed TPO-Ab (cases) or remained without thyroid antibodies (controls). Controls in both studies were matched for age, BMI, smoking status, estrogen use, month of blood sampling, and in study B for the duration of follow-up. Results: Serum 25(OH) D levels were as follows: study A: 21.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.0 +/- 6.4 ng/ml (78 cases vs 78 controls, P=0.01); study B: baseline, 22.6 +/- 10.3 vs 23.4 +/- 9.1; follow-up 21.6 +/- 9.2 vs 21.2 +/- 9.3 ng/ml (67 cases vs 67 controls, NS). Conclusions: Early stages of thyroid autoimmunity (in study A genetic susceptibility and in study B development of TPO-Ab) are not associated with low vitamin D levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据