4.6 Article

Mitotane has a strong and a durable inducing effect on CYP3A4 activity

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 164, 期 4, 页码 621-626

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-10-0956

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The effects of mitotane on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of co-administered drugs are mostly unknown. The aim of the present study was to describe the effects of mitotane on the PK of the phenotypic probe midazolam and of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Design: A serendipitous observation was made in two of nine patients who volunteered in a sunitinib pharmacokinetic study. Both patients were diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and were exposed to mitotane. The sunitinib PK study was designed to determine the relationship between CYP3A4 activity and sunitinib exposure using 7.5 mg midazolam orally as a phenotypic probe. Patient and methods: Serial blood samples for PK analysis of midazolam, 1-hydroxy-midazolam, and sunitinib were collected at steady-state sunitinib PK (between days 14 and 20). To confirm this observation in the mitotane-exposed patients, midazolam PK was evaluated in two additional patients with ACC and mitotane treatment. Results: The four mitotane-treated patients showed highly induced CYP3A4 activity, even after interrupting mitotane therapy months before study entry, reflected by decreased midazolam exposure compared with the other seven patients (mean AUC(0-12 h) (95% CI): 7.6 (5.5-9.7) vs 139.0 (95.1-182.9) mu gXh/l respectively P=0.001) and increased 1-hydroxy-midazolam exposure (mean AUC(0-12 h) (95% CI): 409.6 (290.5-528.7) vs 35.0 (26.4-43.6) mu gXh/l, P=0.008). Sunitinib exposure was decreased in the two patients who were co-treated with mitotane (267 and 268 mu gXh/l versus 1344 (1079-1609) (mean (95% CI)) mu gXh/l). Conclusion: Mitotane has a strong and long-lasting inducing effect on CYP3A4 activity, which will result in clinically relevant interactions with multiple drugs since many drugs are metabolized by this enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据