4.6 Article

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery of Nelson syndrome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 143-148

出版社

BIO SCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0687

关键词

-

资金

  1. Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Helse Vest)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) can be used as primary or adjuvant therapy for the treatment of an ACTH-producing pituitary tumor after bilateral adrenalectomy, called Nelson syndrome (NS). We have examined the effect of GKR on tumor growth and ACTH-hypersecretion, and characterized the adverse events of this treatment in patients with NS. Design: Cross-sectional follow-up study. First, retrospective data pre- and post-GKR were collected. Patients then underwent a predefined survey including radiological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, and neurosurgical evaluation. Subjects: Ten patients treated with GKR for NS after previous bilateral adrenalectomy The mean follow-up was 7 years. No patient was lost to follow-up. Results: Tumor growth was stopped in all patients. The ACTH levels declined in eight patients, and normalized in one patient. There was a significant drop in ACTI-I levels, with a half-time of 2.8 years. No patient developed visual field defects or any other cranial nerve dysfunction as a result of treatment. Four patients started hormone substitution therapy during the follow-up period. The substitution therapy of three pituitary axes present at GKR treatment could be stopped during the same period. One patient developed a glioblastoma in the left parieto-occipital region 14 years after GKR. far from the field of treatment. As the radiation level was below 1Gy to this area, it is unlikely that the GKR treatment itself induced the malignant tumor. Conclusion: In patients with NS, GKR is an effective adjuvant treatment, carrying relatively few adverse effects. Although the risk of developing a secondary neoplasia after GKR is present, it is probably extremely low.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据