4.6 Article

Fasting insulin has a stronger association with an adverse cardiometabolic risk profile than insulin resistance: the RISC study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 161, 期 2, 页码 223-230

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0058

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Fasting insulin concentrations are often used as a surrogate measure or insulin resistance. We investigated the relative contributions Of fasting insulin and insulin resistance to cardiometabolic risk and preclinical atherosclerosis. Design and methods: The Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular disease (RISC) cohort consists of 1326 European non-diabetic. overall healthy men and women aged 30-60 years. We performed standard oral glucose tolerance tests and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps. As a general measure of cardiovascular risk, we assessed the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome ill 1177 participants. Carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) was measured by ultrasound to assess preclinical atherosclerosis. Results: Fasting insulin was correlated with all elements of the metabolic syndrome. Insulin sensitivity (M/I) was correlated with most. elements. The odds ratio for the metabolic syndrome of those ill the highest quartile of fasting insulin compared with those in the lower quartiles was 5.4 (95%, confidence interval (CI) 2.8-10.3. adjusted for insulin sensitivity) in men and 5.1 (2.6-9.9) in women. The odds ratio for metabolic syndrome of those With insulin sensitivity in the lowest. quartile of the cohort compared with those in the higher quartiles was 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.7, adjusted for fasting insulin) ill men and 1.6 (0.8-3.1) in women. Carotid IMT was only statistically significantly associated with fasting insulin in both men and women. Conclusions: Fasting insulin, a simple and practical measure. may be a stronger and independent contributor to cardiometabolic risk and atherosclerosis in a healthy Population than hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp-derived insulin sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据