4.4 Article

Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charite Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 103-108

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e609

关键词

diagnosis; emergency medicine; outcome assessment; symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To evaluate the relationship between chief complaints and their underlying diseases and outcome in medical emergency departments (EDs). Methods All 34 333 patients who attended two of the EDs of the Charite Berlin over a 1-year period were included in the analysis. Data were retrieved from the hospital information system. For study purposes, the chief complaint (chest pain, dyspnoea, abdominal pain, headache or 'none of these symptoms') was prospectively documented in an electronic file by the ED-physician. Documentation was mandatory. Results The majority of patients (66%) presented with 'none of these symptoms', 11.5% with chest pain, 11.1% with abdominal pain and 7.4% with dyspnoea. In total, 39.4% of all patients were admitted to the hospital. The leading diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome (50.7%) for chest pain in-patients and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.5%) and heart failure (16.1%) for in-patients with dyspnoea. The causes of abdominal pain in in-patients were of diverse gastrointestinal origin (47.2%). In-hospital mortality of in-patients was 4.7%. Patients with chest pain had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (0.9%) than patients with dyspnoea (9.4%) and abdominal pain (5.1%). Conclusion The majority of emergency patients lack diagnosis-specific symptoms. Chief complaints help preselect patients but must not be mistaken as disease specific. Mortality largely differs depending on the chief complaint. In chest pain patients, standardized processes may be one factor that explains the low mortality in this group. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 20:103-108 (c) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据