4.4 Article

Triage with the French Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale: reliability and validity

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 61-67

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328304ae57

关键词

classification; emergency medicine; emergency nursing; triage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The FRench Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale (FRENCH) is the first French triage tool for patients visiting an emergency department. The FRENCH scale modified in 2006, based on about 100 determinants (complaints, signs, and vital parameters), allows the triage of adult patients according to five increasing levels of complexity/severity. We evaluated FRENCH version 2 (v.2) in our emergency department. Methods Reliability was evaluated on 300 prospectively selected patient records (50% of patients admitted). Three nurse pairs, blinded with respect to the original triage, retrospectively and independently triaged 100 patients. Interrater reliability within the pairs was measured with a weighted K. Validity was evaluated on all triaged patients (N = 941) over 14 days by studying the relationships between the original triage category assigned by the triage nurse and resource consumption and the admission rate. Results Interrater reliability was good [K = 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.82)]. Distribution of the 941 Patients included in the validation study (18% of whom were admitted) was as follows [n(%)]: 2 (0.2), 33 (4), 258 (27), 451 (48), and 197 (21) for a triage from 1 to 5, respectively. Resource consumption correlated well with case severity as assessed by the triage category (R = -0.643, P < 0.0001). Finally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of admission as a function of triage was 0.858 (95% confidence interval: 0.831-0.885). Conclusion FRENCH v.2 is a reliable and validated triage tool to predict the complexity/severity of a patient in our emergency department. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 16:61-67 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据