4.0 Article

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dehydroepiandrosterone during use of an ethinylestradiol- and drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2013.822061

关键词

Oral contraception; Androgens; DHEA; DHEA-S; Testosterone; Pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Andromed
  2. Ardana
  3. Auxogyn
  4. Ferring
  5. Genovum
  6. Merck (MSD)
  7. Merck Serono
  8. Organon
  9. Pantharei Bioscience
  10. PregLem
  11. Schering
  12. Schering Plough
  13. Serono
  14. Uteron Pharma
  15. Watson Pharmaceuticals
  16. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce the levels of ovarian and adrenal androgens. Co-administration of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) may normalise androgen levels during COC use. Objective To investigate the effect of the addition of DHEA to a COC on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of DHEA and its sulphate (DHEA-S), and on levels of total and free testosterone (T). Methods In a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving 21 female volunteers, the PK and PD of DHEA and DHEA-S were investigated during the use of one cycle of a COC containing 30 mu g ethinylestradiol (EE) and 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) with and without daily co-administration of 50 mg DHEA. Results Treatment during one cycle with a COC containing EE and DRSP reduces the exposure to DHEA and DHEA-S by at least 20%. This loss of adrenal androgens can be fully compensated by daily oral co-administration of 50 mg DHEA. With DHEA co-administration total T levels rise significantly (1.44 nmol/L with DHEA vs. 0.82 nmol/L with placebo; p < 0.001). Free T levels decrease significantly with both DHEA and placebo treatment, but significantly less during co-administration of DHEA (6.34 pmol/L with DHEA vs. 3.96 pmol/L with placebo; p < 0.001). Conclusion By adding DHEA to a COC the loss of adrenal and ovarian androgens can be restored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据