4.3 Article

Pharmacokinetics of the novel PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar in patients with hepatic impairment

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 68, 期 11, 页码 1501-1508

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1269-7

关键词

Vorapaxar; Hepatic impairment; Pharmacokinetics; SCH 530348; PAR-1 antagonist; Thrombin receptor antagonist

资金

  1. Schering-Plough Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine whether hepatic impairment has an effect on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorapaxar or M20, its main pharmacologically active metabolite. This was an open-label study in which a single 40-mg oral dose of vorapaxar was administered to patients with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), and severe (n = 4) hepatic impairment and healthy controls (n = 16) matched for age, gender, weight, and height. Blood samples for vorapaxar and M20 assay were collected predose and at frequent intervals up to 8 weeks postdose. Plasma vorapaxar and M20 PK profiles were similar between patients with impaired liver function and healthy controls. Group mean values for vorapaxar C-max and AUC(tf) were 206-279 ng/mL and 14,200-18,200 ng center dot h/mL, respectively, with the lowest values observed in patients with severe impairment. Vorapaxar median T-max and mean t(1/2) values were 1.00-1.75 h and 298-366 h, respectively. There was no apparent correlation between vorapaxar or M20 exposure or t(1/2) values and disease severity. Vorapaxar was generally well tolerated; one serious adverse event (gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to ruptured esophageal varices) was reported in a patient with severe hepatic impairment. Hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant effect on the PK of vorapaxar and M20. No dose or dosage adjustment of vorapaxar will be required in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Although systemic exposure to vorapaxar does not appear to increase in patients with severe hepatic impairment, administration of vorapaxar to such patients is not recommended given their bleeding diathesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据