4.5 Article

Family and infant characteristics associated with timing of core and non-core food introduction in early childhood

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 652-657

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.63

关键词

infant feeding; core foods; non-core foods

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C1418/A7974]
  2. Cancer Research UK [14133] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To identify family and infant characteristics associated with timing of introduction of two food types: core foods (nutrient-dense) and non-core foods (nutrient-poor) in a population-based sample of mothers and infants. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Participants were 1861 mothers and infants from the Gemini twin birth cohort (one child per family). Family and infant characteristics were assessed when the infants were around 8 months old. Timing of introducing core and non-core foods was assessed at 8 and 15 months. As the distributions of timing were skewed, three similar-sized groups were created for each food type: earlier (core: 1-4 months; non-core: 3-8 months), average (core: 5 months; non-core: 9-10 months) and later introduction (core: 6-12 months; non-core: 11-18 months). Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine predictors of core and non-core food introduction, with bootstrapping to test for differences between the core and non-core models. RESULTS: Younger maternal age, lower education level and higher maternal body mass index were associated with earlier core and non-core food introduction. Not breastfeeding for at least 3 months and higher birth weight were specifically associated with earlier introduction of core foods. Having older children was specifically associated with earlier introduction of non-core foods. CONCLUSIONS: There are similarities and differences in the characteristics associated with earlier introduction of core and non-core foods. Successful interventions may require a combination of approaches to target both food types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据