4.5 Article

Low-carbohydrate, high-protein score and mortality in a northern Swedish population-based cohort

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 694-700

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.9

关键词

diet; survival; macronutrients; protein intake; carbohydrate intake; cohort study

资金

  1. Nordic Health Whole Grain Food (HELGA)/NordForsk
  2. Visare Norr, Northern County Councils

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Long-term effects of carbohydrate-restricted diets are unclear. We examined a low-carbohydrate, high-protein (LCHP) score in relation to mortality. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study on adults in the northern Swedish county of Vasterbotten. In 37 639 men (1460 deaths) and 39 680 women (923 deaths) from the population-based Vasterbotten Intervention Program, deciles of energy-adjusted carbohydrate (descending) and protein (ascending) intake were added to create an LCHP score (2-20 points). Sex-specific hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox regression. RESULTS: Median intakes of carbohydrates, protein and fat in subjects with LCHP scores 2-20 ranged from 61.0% to 38.6%, 11.3% to 19.2% and 26.6% to 41.5% of total energy intake, respectively. High LCHP score (14-20 points) did not predict all-cause mortality compared with low LCHP score (2-8 points), after accounting for saturated fat intake and established risk factors (men: HR for high vs low 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.20), P for continuous 0.721; women: HR for high vs low 1.10 (95% CI 0.91-1.32), P for continuous 0.229). For cancer and cardiovascular disease, no clear associations were found. Carbohydrate intake was inversely associated with all-cause mortality, though only statistically significant in women (multivariate HR per decile increase 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99), P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support a clear, general association between LCHP score and mortality. Studies encompassing a wider range of macronutrient consumption may be necessary to detect such an association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据