4.5 Article

Intravenous acetate elicits a greater free fatty acid rebound in normal than hyperinsulinaemic humans

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 1029-1034

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.98

关键词

humans; acetate; FFA; insulin sensitivity

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes [OOP-64648]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Colonic fermentation of dietary fiber may improve insulin sensitivity by the metabolic effects of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in reducing free fatty acids (FFA). The main objectives of this study were to compare peripheral uptake of acetate (AC) in participants with normal (<40 pmol/l, NI) and high (>= 40 pmol/l, HI) plasma insulin, and the ability of AC to reduce FFA in both the groups. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Overnight fasted NI (n = 9) and HI (n = 9) participants were given an intravenous (IV) infusion of 140 mmol/l sodium acetate at three different rates over 90 min. The total amount of AC infused was 51.85 mmols. RESULTS: AC clearance in NI participants was not significantly different than that in HI participants (2.11 +/- 0.23 vs 2.09 +/- 0.24 ml/min). FFA fell in both the groups, but rebounded to a greater extent in NI than HI participants (time x group interaction, P = 0.001). Significant correlations between insulin resistance (IR) indices (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), Matsuda and insulinogenic index) vs FFA rebound during IV AC infusion were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that AC uptake is similar in both the groups. Participants with lower plasma insulin and lower IR indices had a greater FFA rebound. These results support the hypothesis that increasing AC concentrations in the systemic circulation may reduce lipolysis and plasma FFA concentrations and thus improve insulin sensitivity. More in-depth studies are needed to look at the effects of SCFA on FFA metabolism in insulin-resistant participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据