4.5 Article

Body mass index percentiles for children and adolescents in Germany based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS 2003-2006)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 341-349

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.8

关键词

body mass index; centiles; overweight; childhood; adolescence; reference values

资金

  1. German Ministry of Health
  2. Ministry of Education and Research
  3. Robert Koch Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To present body mass index (BMI) percentiles representative for children in Germany and to compare them with the currently used percentiles by Kromeyer-Hauschild (KH) and international percentiles of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF). Methods: Representative examination survey of 17 641 children and adolescents aged 0-17 years living in Germany (KiGGS 2003-2006 study, response rate 67%) with standardized measurement of height and weight. Results: Generally, BMI in KiGGS was higher than in the reference populations from previous decades. KiGGS shows an asymmetric upward shift of the BMI distribution from about age 6 years and an earlier adiposity rebound compared with KH. The BMI peak in the first year of life is shown by KiGGS and WHO, but much less by KH. The cut-offs for overweight and obesity determined with the IOTF methodology in KiGGS (percentiles corresponding to BMI 25 and 30 kg/m(2) at 18 years of age) were similar to IOTF cut-offs from age 18 to 10 years but systematically lower for younger children. Conclusions: The KiGGS BMI percentiles appear more valid for Germany than present alternatives and should be used for population monitoring. Despite their methodological limitations, the general shape of the older German KH references is confirmed by KiGGS for the ages 2-17 years. In order not to obscure the increase in obesity rates in the last decades, we therefore propose to continue using KH for individual diagnosis and estimation of the prevalence of overweight and obesity in this age range. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2010) 64, 341-349; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.8; published online 24 February 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据