4.5 Article

Risk associations of obesity with sugar-sweetened beverages and lifestyle factors in Chinese: the 'Better Health for Better Hong Kong' health promotion campaign

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 1386-1392

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.181

关键词

sugar-sweetened beverages; obesity; gender; age; Chinese

资金

  1. Hong Kong Hospital Authority
  2. Li Ka Shing Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objectives: Excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) increases risk of obesity. Similar data are lacking in Chinese populations with rapid nutritional transition. We aimed to examine the association between SSB intake, lifestyle factors and obesity in Hong Kong Chinese. Subjects/Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey on SSB intake with 2295 (49.6%) men and 2334 (50.4%) women (age: median 43.0 years, range 18-81 years). They were recruited from a territory-wide health promotion campaign in Hong Kong. All subjects completed a questionnaire and underwent simple health tests. Their SSB intake was based on a 1-week recall (1 unit of SSB 250 ml, frequent SSB consumption daily intake >= 2 units). Results: Men were more likely than women to smoke, drink alcohol, frequently consumed SSB (20.5 vs 9.5%) and ate more meat portions (2.32 +/- 0.57 vs 2.15 +/- 0.44) but were physically more active (no exercise: 31.2 vs 39.2%) (P-values: all <0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, frequent SSB intake remained independently associated with obesity in women (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.86 (1.36-2.55)) while physical inactivity (1.84 (1.41-2.39) for none vs regular), smoking (1.29 (1.05-1.58)) and high daily meat intake (2.15 (1.36, 3.42)) predicted obesity in men. Conclusions: In Chinese of working age, SSB consumption in women and physical inactivity, smoking and high meat intake in men were associated with obesity. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2010) 64, 1386-1392; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.181; published online 8 September 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据