4.5 Article

Differential effects of casein versus whey on fasting plasma levels of insulin, IGF-1 and IGF-1/IGFBP-3: results from a randomized 7-day supplementation study in prepubertal boys

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 1076-1083

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.34

关键词

milk; casein; whey; IGF-1; insulin; children

资金

  1. Danish Dairy Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objectives: Milk increases both fasting insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and thereby growth, in healthy prepubertal boys. It is, however, unknown which components in milk are responsible for milk's growth-stimulating effect. Subjects/Methods: To get closer to the identification of which components in milk that stimulate growth, we have performed an intervention study with 57 eight-year-old boys in which we examined the effects of the two major milk protein fractions, whey and casein, and milk minerals (Ca and P) in a 2 x 2 factorial design on IGFs and glucose-insulin metabolism. The amounts of whey and casein were identical to the content in 1.51 skim milk. The amounts of Ca and P were similar to 1.51 skim milk in the high-mineral drinks, whereas the amounts of Ca and P were reduced in the low-mineral drinks. Results: There were no interactions between milk mineral groups (high, low) and milk protein groups (whey, casein). Serum IGF-1 increased by 15% (P<0.0001), whereas there was no change in fasting insulin (P = 0.36) in the casein group. In the whey group, fasting insulin increased by 21% (P = 0.006), with no change in IGF-1 (P = 0.27). There were no independent effects of a high milk mineral intake on IGF-1 and insulin. Conclusions: The main milk protein fractions exhibit important but different growth-promoting effects by increasing either fasting insulin (whey) or IGF-1 (casein) levels. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2009) 63, 1076-1083; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.34; published online 27 May 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据