4.5 Article

Serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori infection-a Japanese population study

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1543-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Multi-institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study) from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decreased ratio of serum pepsinogen (PG) I and II has good correlation with the presence of atrophic gastritis. A total of 1,540 residents aged 30-89 years were enrolled into this study to investigate which serum PG level of residents with Helicobacter pylori infection would represent an adjunct to the diagnosis and progression of atrophic gastritis. All participants received esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Serum antibody to H. pylori (anti-H. pylori) was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serological atrophic gastritis was defined as serum PG I isozyme level a parts per thousand currency sign70 ng/ml and a PG I/II ratio of a parts per thousand currency sign3.0. Of the 1,540 participants, 923 (59.9%) were positive for anti-H. pylori. Serological atrophic gastritis was found significantly more often in anti-H. pylori-positive participants (40.8%) than in anti-H. pylori-negative participants (7.9%) (p a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 0.0001). The endoscopic findings of anti-H. pylori-positive participants with serological atrophic gastritis were significantly more frequent by 4.06 times for atrophic gastritis (p a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 0.0001) than anti-H. pylori-negative participants without serological atrophic gastritis. Eight anti-H. pylori-positive participants were diagnosed with gastric cancer, but no cancer was found in anti-H. pylori-negative participants without serological atrophic gastritis. Serum PG testing is clinically useful for the prediction of gastric lesions in H. pylori-infected persons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据