4.5 Article

Relevance of lower airway bacterial colonization, airway inflammation, and pulmonary function in the stable stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-1027-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this investigation was to verify the hypothesis that the presence of lower airway bacterial colonization (LABC) can be a stimulating factor of airway inflammation, more frequent exacerbation, and impact on pulmonary function, independent of current tobacco smoking in the stable phase of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 46 ex-smokers with moderate to severe COPD, 19 healthy non-smokers, and 17 ex-smokers without COPD were included in this study. Their sputum specimens were collected at the first baseline visit and at the second visit after a follow-up of one year. The samples were analyzed for bacterial growth by culture, and the levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The frequencies of exacerbations and pulmonary function were compared at visit 2. At visit 1, 37.0% (17/46) were found to have LABC with bacterial loads >= 10(6) CFU/ml in their sputum specimens. Haemophilus influenzae was the predominant pathogenic organism isolated. IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-alpha in these patients' sputum were significantly higher than those without LABC (p < 0.05). It was the presence of LABC that contributed to the significantly elevated IL-8 and IL-6 at the 1-year period (p < 0.05). LABC was also associated with significantly increased frequencies of exacerbations and declined forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (p < 0.05). LABC was documented in a subpopulation of stable COPD patients; it may be responsible for the deterioration of pulmonary function of COPD patients by promoting airway inflammation and/or increased frequency of exacerbations independently of tobacco smoking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据