4.6 Article

Diabetes and breast cancer in Taiwanese women: a detection bias?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 910-917

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12323

关键词

Breast cancer; cumulative incidence; diabetes mellitus; risk ratio; Taiwan

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC102-2314-B-002-067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To evaluate whether diabetes is a risk factor for breast cancer considering confounders and potential detection examinations. Methods National Health Insurance data on 501 747 women without breast cancer were retrieved. Three-year cumulative incidence (2003-2005) and risk ratios (RRs) between diabetic and nondiabetic women were calculated. Potential detection examinations were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic women by chi-square test. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression for diabetes status/duration with and without adjustment for potential detection examinations and confounders. Results The crude RR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for all ages, and age groups < 50, 50-64 and >= 65 years, was 2.62 (2.31-2.91), 2.69 (2.11-3.44), 1.39 (1.15-1.68) and 1.37 (1.03-1.84), respectively. Patients with diabetes more frequently received potential detection examinations than nondiabetes (17.5% vs. 7.4%, P-value < 0.001). The unadjusted OR (95% CI) for breast cancer for diabetes status (yes vs. no) was 2.63 (2.31-2.98) and was significant for any diabetes duration. The OR for diabetes status was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.59-2.06) after adjustment for potential detection examinations. In models adjusted for potential detection examinations, age, living region, occupation, comorbidities and used medications, OR for diabetes status attenuated to 1.13 (95% CI 0.96-1.32, P-value =0.14) and none was significant for any diabetes duration. Potential detection examinations were associated with a fivefold to sevenfold higher risk in various models, indicating a strong impact of detection bias. Conclusions An association between diabetes and breast cancer is observed, but this can be due to potential detection bias and confounders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据