4.6 Article

Lactobacillus reuteri accelerates gastric emptying and improves regurgitation in infants

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 417-422

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02425.x

关键词

Functional regurgitation; gastric motility; probiotic

资金

  1. BioGaia AB, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Background Young infants are frequently affected by uncomplicated regurgitation that may persist despite dietetic and conservative interventions. On this basis, we studied the putative effects of probiotics on the frequency of regurgitation and gastric emptying time in infants with functional gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Patients and methods Forty-two infants with regurgitation were randomized to assume Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 at a dose of 1 x 108 CFU per day and placebo for 30 days. The episodes of regurgitation were recorded by the parents each day. Gastric emptying time was recorded using real-time ultrasound at baseline and at the end of the study. Twenty-one infants without regurgitation were enroled to compare anthropometric and physiological parameters before the intervention diet. Results Thirty-four infants completed the study (19 infants receiving probiotics and 15 placebo).At baseline, the whole group of infants was similar to the control group as regards anthropometric and physiological data. The median fasting antral area was significantly reduced, (P = 0 center dot 01) the delta in gastric emptying rate was significantly increased (P = 0 center dot 01) and the median episodes per day of regurgitation was reduced (, P < 0 center dot 001) in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group. In the whole group, the frequency of regurgitation and the basal antral area showed a positive correlation (r = 0 center dot 53, P = 0 center dot 004). Conclusions In infants with functional GER, L. reuteri DSM 17938 reduce gastric distension and accelerate gastric emptying. In addition, this probiotic strain seems to diminish the frequency of regurgitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据