4.6 Article

Clinical screening and diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy: the North Catalonia Diabetes Study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 183-189

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02074.x

关键词

Diabetic polyneuropathy; diagnosis; primary care; screening; selection method

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [FIS 01/0846, FIS 04/0181]
  2. Plan Nacional de I+D+I

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background To evaluate the prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and develop a simple and accurate method for the evaluation of DPN risk in primary care settings. Materials and methods Cross-sectional descriptive study in a random sample (N = 307) of type 2 diabetes mellitus participants. DPN was diagnosed by both clinical neurological examination and simplified DPN Selection Method in each patient. Correlation between the two methods was obtained Results Prevalence of DPN was 23.13% (confidence interval, 18.38-27.87) according to clinical neurological examination. Noteworthy, clinical neurological evaluation scores were related to nerve conduction studies (r = 0.882; P < 0.0005). DPN presence was positively related to age, metabolic control (HbA1c levels), known duration of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, peripheral ischemia and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but was negatively related to current high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of our DPN Selection Method (using four clinical parameters: age, retinopathy, HbA1c and HDL-C plasma levels) for diagnosis of DPN was 74.20% and 74.90%, respectively. Conclusions The expected prevalence of DPN was observed. The sensitivity of the DPN Selection Method correlated well with formal clinical neurological exam in detection of the condition. We therefore conclude the DPN Selection Method is a useful tool in primary care settings in the evaluation and diagnosis of DPN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据