4.6 Article

Physicochemical properties of ferumoxytol, a new intravenous iron preparation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 489-496

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02130.x

关键词

Bleomycin detectable iron; free iron; molecular weight; osmolality; ferumoxytol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intravenous iron is a critical component of anaemia management. However, currently available preparations have been associated with the release of free iron, a promoter of bacterial growth and oxidative stress. We determined the molecular weight, dialysability and capacity for free iron release of ferumoxytol, a semi-synthetic carbohydrate-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle. Ferumoxytol was compared with three intravenous iron preparations in clinical use: iron dextran (low molecular weight), sodium ferric gluconate and iron sucrose. Intravenous iron preparations were also incubated in rat, and pooled human sera (at concentrations of 600 mu M and 42 mu g mL(-1) respectively) from healthy subjects. The molecular weight of ferumoxytol was 731 kDa. The relative order of molecular weight was as follows: ferumoxytol > iron dextran > iron sucrose > sodium ferric gluconate. The least ultrafilterable iron was observed with ferumoxytol and the most with ferric gluconate. The least dialysable free iron was observed with ferumoxytol and the most with ferric gluconate. Incubation of intravenous iron preparations in rat or pooled human sera demonstrated minimal free iron release with ferumoxytol. The order of catalytic iron release as detected by the bleomycin detectable iron assay was as follows: ferumoxytol < iron dextran < iron sucrose < ferric gluconate. A similar trend was observed for the in vivo serum concentration of free iron in rats. In vitro observations from these experiments suggest that ferumoxytol has a favourable profile in terms of tendency to release free iron, in comparison with currently available intravenous iron preparations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据