4.5 Article

The Ras related GTPase Miro is not required for mitochondrial transport in Dictyostelium discoideum

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 4, 页码 342-355

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.10.012

关键词

Miro; Mitochondrial transport; Small GTPase; Dictyostelium

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Medical Faculty, University of Cologne
  3. Kathe-Hack, Imhoff foundation
  4. Maria-Pesch foundation
  5. Czech Science Foundation [P305/10/0205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ras-related GTPases of the Miro family have been implicated in mitochondrial homeostasis and microtubule-dependent transport. They consist of two GTP-binding domains separated by calcium-binding motifs and of a C-terminal transmembrane domain that targets the protein to the outer mitochondrial membrane. We disrupted the single Miro-encoding gene in Dictyostelium discoideum and observed a substantial growth defect that we attribute to a decreased mitochondrial mass and cellular ATP content. However, mutant cells even showed an increased rate of oxygen consumption, while glucose consumption, mitochondrial transmembrane potential and production of reactive oxygen species were unaltered. Processes characteristic of the multicellular stage of the D. discoideum life cycle were also unaltered. Although mitochondria occasionally use microtubules for transport in D. discoideum, their size and distribution were not visibly affected. We found Miro in all branches of the eukaryotic tree with the exception of a few protist lineages (mainly those lacking typical mitochondria). Trypanosomatids and ciliates possess structurally unique homologs lacking the N-terminal or the C-terminal GTPase domain, respectively. We propose that in D. discoideum, as in yeasts and plants, Miro plays roles in mitochondrial homeostasis, but the ability to build a complex that regulates its association to kinesin for microtubule-dependent transport probably arose in metazoans. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据