4.5 Review

The A Disintegrin And Metalloproteases ADAM10 and ADAM17: Novel drug targets with therapeutic potential?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 6-7, 页码 527-535

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.11.005

关键词

ADAMs; Cell adhesion; Signalling; Inflammation; Cancer; Neurodegeneration; Shedding

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonder forschungsbereich 415, 877]
  2. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, DeZnit (EU-FP VI) [P5/19]
  3. Center of Excellence Inflammation at Interfaces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteolytic ectodomain release, a process known as shedding, has been recognised as a key mechanism for regulating the function of a diversity of cell surface proteins. A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinases (ADAMs) have emerged as the major proteinase family that mediates ectodomain shedding. Dysregulation of ectodomain shedding is associated with autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases, neurodegeneration, infection, inflammation and cancer. Therefore, ADAMs are increasingly regarded as attractive targets for novel therapies. ADAM10 and its close relative ADAM17 (TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE)) have been studied in particular in the context of ectodomain shedding and have been demonstrated as key molecules in most of the shedding events characterised to date. Whereas the level of expression of ADAM] 0 may be of importance in cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, ADAM 17 mainly coordinates pro- and anti-inflammatory activities during immune response. Despite the high therapeutical potential of ADAM inhibition, all clinical trials using broad-spectrum metalloprotease inhibitors have failed so far. This review will cover the emerging roles of both ADAM10 and ADAM17 in the regulation of major physiological and developmental pathways and will discuss the suitability of specifically modulating the activities of both proteases as a feasible way to inhibit inflammatory states, cancer and neurodegeneration. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据