3.9 Article

Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a prospective multilevel study

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328305df05

关键词

cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; enrollment; patient factors; physician factors

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-74431]
  2. Ontario Women's Health Council/CIHR Institute Of Gender and Health
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an established means of reducing mortality, yet is grossly underutilized. This is due to both health system and patient-level factors; issues that have yet to be investigated concurrently. This Study utilized a hierarchical design to examine physician and patient-level factors affecting verified CR enrollment. Design A prospective multisite study, using a multilevel design of 1490 coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 Ontario cardiology practices (mean 15 per cardiologist). Methods Cardiologists completed a survey regarding CR attitudes. Outpatients were surveyed prospectively to assess factors affecting CR enrollment. Patients were mailed a follow-up survey 9 months later to self-report CR enrollment. This was verified with 40 CR sites. Results Five hundred and fifty (43.4%) outpatients were referred, and 469 (37.0%) enrolled in CR. In mixed logistic regression analyses, factors affecting verified CR enrollment were greater strength of physician endorsement (P=0.005), shorter distance to CR (P=0.001), being married (P=0.01), and fewer perceived CR barriers (P=0.03). Conclusion Both physician and patient factors play a part in CR enrollment. Patient CR barriers should be addressed during referral discussions, and reasons why physicians fail to uniformly endorse CR exploration. Although distance to CR was related to patient enrollment patterns, greater access to home-based CR services should be provided. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 15:548-556 (C) 2008 The European Society of Cardiology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据