3.9 Article

Marital status and risk of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest in the population

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283083e04

关键词

epidemiology; marital status; risk factors; sudden death

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland [HL-42456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background We have recently reported on the association between clinical depression and out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). In this study, we extend our research on the contribution of psychosocial characteristics to SCA, by examining the association between marital status and out-of-hospital SCA. Design A large case-control study of risk factors for incident SCA including 2119 cases and 4042-matched controls. Methods Participants were enrollees of a health maintenance organization (USA). Cases experienced SCA between 1980 and 1994 (mean age of 67 years). Controls were a stratified random sample of enrollees, with the strata defined by age, sex, earlier heart disease, and calendar year. The marital status at the time of the SCA or a comparable index date for controls was assessed using ambulatory care medical records. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval. Results Cases were more likely to be unmarried than the controls (30.2% vs. 21.0%), defined as being separated or divorced (10.0% vs. 70%), single (5.0% vs. 3.6%) or widowed (15.2% vs. 10.4%). Unmarried participants had a higher risk of SCA (odds ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.76), after adjustment for SCA risk factors. Consistent findings were observed according to sex, older age (>70 years), earlier coronary heart disease and the presence of clinical depression. Those who were both unmarried and clinically depressed had the highest risk of SCA. Conclusion These data support an association between marital status and SCA. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 15:577-582 (C) 2008 The European Society of Cardiology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据