4.4 Article

Cancer survivors' experiences of discharge from hospital follow-up

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 390-397

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01312.x

关键词

cancer follow-up; hospital discharge; long-term cancer survivors

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C23140/A8854]
  2. Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership [3803]
  3. Oxford Cancer Intelligence Unit
  4. Northern Cancer Registry and Information Service
  5. Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discharge from hospital follow-up is a key time point in the cancer journey. With recommendations for earlier discharge of cancer survivors, attention to the discharge process is likely to become increasingly important. This study explored cancer survivors' experiences of discharge from hospital follow-up. Survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer (n = 1275), 5-16 years post diagnosis were approached to take part in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire included questions about discharge status, provision of time/information prior to discharge, feelings at discharge and satisfaction with how discharge was managed. Completed questionnaires were returned by 659 survivors (51.7%). Approximately one-third of respondents were not discharged from follow-up 5-16 years post diagnosis. Of those discharged, a substantial minority reported insufficient time (27.9%), information (24.5-45.0%) or adverse emotions (30.9%) at the time of discharge. However, 90.6% of respondents reported satisfaction with how discharge from hospital follow-up was managed. Despite high levels of satisfaction, discharge of cancer survivors from hospital follow-up could be improved with the provision of additional time, information and support. Better structuring of the final hospital appointment or a review appointment in primary care at this time could help to ensure that discharge from hospital follow-up is managed optimally for cancer survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据