4.7 Article

Differential risks of cancer types in people with Parkinson's disease: A national record-linkage study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 50, 期 14, 页码 2456-2462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.018

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Cancer; Association; Risk; Malignancy

类别

资金

  1. English National Institute for Health Research [RNC/035/002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is evidence that people with Parkinson's disease (PD) have a decreased risk of developing cancer. PD has also variably been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cancers like melanoma and breast. We investigated this relationship in a very large cohort of PD patients. Methods: We constructed two cohorts of people from an all-England record-linked hospital and mortality dataset spanning 1999-2011. One cohort comprised people with a record of PD; the other comprised people without a record of PD. We 'followed up' these two cohorts to determine observed and expected numbers of people with subsequent primary cancers in each, based on person-years at risk, and calculated standardised rate ratios (RRs). Results: In 219,194 people with PD, the RR for all subsequent primary malignant cancers combined was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-0.93). Increased RRs (p < 0.05) were found for six out of the 31 cancer types investigated, including breast, melanoma, uterus, kidney, and neurological malignancies. Decreased RRs were found for 11 cancer sites, including lung and colon cancer. Conclusions: We corroborate the findings of a reduced risk for the development of cancers in PD patients shown in smaller studies, including cancers associated and not known to be associated with smoking; and of an increased risk of melanoma and breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between PD and elevated rates of uterine and renal cancer. Further work is warranted to understand the mechanisms behind these findings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据