4.7 Article

Predicting lymph node metastases in early rectal cancer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1104-1108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.005

关键词

Rectal cancer; Rectal neoplasia; Lymph node metastases; Risk

类别

资金

  1. Karolinska Institutet (ALF) [20100123]
  2. Bengt Ihre foundation [SLS-94401, SLS-248341, SLS-171781]
  3. Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: In this population-based study, the aim was to investigate risk factors for lymph node metastases and to construct a risk stratification index with relevance for pre-operative planning in T1 and T2 rectal cancers. Methods: Data were retrieved from The Swedish Rectal Cancer Register, a mandatory, national, prospectively collected data base. All T1 and T2 rectal cancers treated with abdominal resection surgery without neo-adjuvant or adjuvant radio-chemotherapy from 2007 to 2010 were analysed. T-stage, sm-level, histologic differentiation, mucinous tumour type, blood vessel-and perineural infiltration, tumour location (in cm from the anal verge), age and gender were evaluated as potential predictors of lymph node metastases, using uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Results: T2-stage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0), poor differentiation (OR = 6.5) and vascular infiltration (OR = 4.3) were identified as significant risk-factors for lymph node metastases in the multivariate analysis. The risk stratification index shows the risk for lymph node metastases gradually increasing from 6% to 65% and 11% to 78% in T1 and T2 cancers respectively, when adding the risk factors one by one. Conclusion: There is a considerable span in the risk for lymph node metastases between low risk T1 and high risk T2 rectal cancer. Using the risk stratification-model, with the concept of local excision as a macro-biopsy with standby for subsequent immediate radical resection surgery in high-risk cases, could benefit patients by providing the advantages of local excision yet ensuring adequate oncologic outcome. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据