4.7 Article

Adrenocortical carcinoma: A population-based study on incidence and survival in the Netherlands since 1993

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 2579-2586

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.034

关键词

Adrenocortical carcinoma; Incidence; Cancer registry

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The reported annual incidence of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is 0.5-2.0 cases per million individuals. Updated population-based studies on incidence are lacking. The aim of this nationwide survey was to describe the incidence and survival rates of ACC in the Netherlands. Secondary objectives were to evaluate changes in both survival rates and the number of patients undergoing surgery. Methods: All ACC patients registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) between 1993 and 2010 were included. Data on demographics, stage of disease, primary treatment modality and survival were evaluated. Results: Included were 359 patients, 196 of whom were female (55%). Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range 1-91). The 5-year age-standardised incidence rate decreased from 1.3 to 1.0 per one million person-years. Median survival for patients with stage I-II, stage III and stage IV disease was 159 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 93-225 months), 26 months (95% CI: 4-48 months) and 5 months (95% CI: 2-7 months), respectively (P < 0.001). Improvement in survival was not observed, as reflected by the lack of association between survival and time of diagnosis. The percentage of patients receiving treatment within 6 months after diagnosis increased significantly from 76% in 1993-1998 to 88% in 2005-2010 (P = 0.047), mainly due to an increase in surgery for stage III-IV patients. Conclusion: These nationwide data provide an up-to-date survey of the epidemiology of ACC in the Netherlands. A trend towards a decreasing overall incidence rate was observed. Survival rates did not change during this period despite an increased number of surgical procedures. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据