4.7 Article

Comorbidity, age and overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer - Results from NCIC CTG PA.3: A phase III trial of gemcitabine plus erlotinib or placebo

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 1434-1442

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.035

关键词

Advanced pancreatic cancer; Age; Charlson Comorbidity Index; Comorbidity; Erlotinib; Gemcitabine

类别

资金

  1. CAMO/CIHR/Rx&D Research Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The effect of comorbidity, age and performance status (PS) on treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is poorly understood. We examined these factors as predictors of outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine +/-erlotinib. Patients and methods: Comorbidity was evaluated by two physicians using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and correlated with clinical outcome data from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) PA.3 clinical trial. Results: Five hundred and sixty-nine patients were included; 47% were >= 65 years old, 36% had a comorbidity (CCI > 0). In multivariate analysis, neither age (p = 0.22) nor comorbidity (p = 0.21) were associated with overall survival. The baseline presence of better PS and lower pain intensity scores were associated with better overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively). An improvement in survival with the addition of erlotinib therapy was seen in patients age < 65 (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, p = 0.01) or in the presence of a comorbidity (adjusted HR 0.72, p = 0.03). However, neither age nor CCI score were predictive of erlotinib benefit after test for interaction. Patients treated with gemcitabine plus erlotinib who were >= 65 years of age or those with comorbidity had a higher rate of infections >= grade 3. Conclusion: Low baseline pain intensity and better PS were associated with improved overall survival, while age and comorbidity were not independent prognostic factors for patients treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据