4.7 Article

Bortezomib in combination with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas: A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 48, 期 17, 页码 3223-3231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.003

关键词

Bortezomib; CHOP; Peripheral T-cell lymphoma

类别

资金

  1. Janssen and Janssen
  2. Janssen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of bortezomib in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) based on our phase I study results. Methods: Patients received bortezomib on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1.6 mg/m(2) in addition to CHOP every 3 weeks for a total of six cycles. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled: PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n = 16), extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL, n = 10), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n = 8), ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL, n = 6), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL, n = 5) and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n = 1). Thirty patients achieved complete response (CR, 65%) and the overall response rate was 76% (35/46). Although the CR rate of ENKTL was only 30% (3/10), three subtypes of PTCLs (PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALCL) showed 87% of overall response rate (ORR) (26/30) and 73% of CR rate (22/30). However, the 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 47% and 35%, respectively due to frequent relapse after remission. Grade 3/4 leucopenia was the most frequent toxicity whereas neurotoxicity was tolerable: grade 1 or 2 of peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions: The combined treatment of bortezomib and CHOP is an effective and feasible regimen for advanced-stage PTCLs other than ENKTL, with acceptable toxicity. However, future studies exploring new drug combinations are warranted to overcome relapse after remission. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据