4.4 Article

INFLUENCE OF THE NUMBER OF PLAYERS AND THE RELATIVE PITCH AREA PER PLAYER ON HEART RATE AND PHYSICAL DEMANDS IN YOUTH SOCCER

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 1683-1691

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000788

关键词

team sport; large-sided games; time-motion; physiology; young

资金

  1. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) [EHU12/14, 13523]
  2. Spanish government (Secretaria de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion del Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) [DEP2012-32124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different large-sided games on the physical and physiological variables in under-13 soccer players. The effects on heart rate (HR) and physical demands of different number of players (NP) (7, 9, and 11) together with the relative pitch area (RPA) (100, 200, and 300 m2) during two 12-minute repetitions were analyzed in this study. The variables analyzed were mean, maximum and different intensity zones of HR; total distance (TD); work: rest ratio (W: R); player load (PL); 5 absolute and 3 relative speed categories. The results support the hypothesis that a change in pitch dimensions affects locomotor activity more than the NP does but also refute the hypothesis that the change in the NP has a greater effect on HR. To be more specific, an increase in the RPA per player (300/200/100 m(2)) was associated with higher values of the following variables: TD (2,250-2,314/2,003-2,148/1,766-1,845 m), W: R (0.5-0.6/0.4-0.5/0.3 arbitrary unit [AU]), PL (271-306/246-285/229-267 AU), % HRmean (85-88/85-89/81-83%), % HRmax (95-100/97-100/95-98%), and affected the percentage of time spent in both absolute (above 8 km.h(-1)) and relative speed (above 40% Vmax) categories (p <= 0.05, effect size: 0.31-0.85). These results may help youth soccer coaches to plan the progressive introduction of large-sided games so that task demands are adapted to the physiological and physical development of participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据