4.7 Article

Haematologic toxicities associated with the addition of bevacizumab in cancer patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 1161-1174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.005

关键词

Bevacizumab; Meta-analysis; Haematologic toxicities; Bone marrow toxicities; Anaemia; Neutropenia; Thrombocytopenia; Febrile neutropenia

类别

资金

  1. philanthropic Trust Family Research Fund for Kidney Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bevacizumab is currently approved for the treatment of several malignancies. Haematologic toxicities are not among the main concerns associated with bevacizumab, but they have been occasionally reported. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence and risk of haematologic toxicities associated with bevacizumab. Methods: Pubmed databases from 1966 to September 2010 were searched for studies reported, as well as American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings. Bevacizumab randomised clinical trials with adequate safety data profile were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: 15,263 patients were included. The incidence of bevacizumab-associated all-grade and high-grade haematologic toxicities were, respectively: anaemia: 18.7% and 3.9%; neutropenia: 25.0% and 18.5%; and thrombocytopenia: 13.9% and 3.4%. Febrile neutropenia incidence was 3.8%. Compared to placebo/control arms, bevacizumab was associated with a decreased risk of all-grade (RR = 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.96; p =.016) and high-grade (RR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.60-0.89; p = .002) anaemia, and increased risks of all-grade (RR = 1.15; 95%CI 1.01-1.30; p = .033) and high-grade (RR = 1.08; 95%CI 1.02-1.13; p = .005) neutropenia, all-grade thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.22; 95%CI 1.00-1.48; p = .047) and febrile neutropenia (RR = 1.31; 95%CI 1.08-1.58; p = .006). Conclusions: Bevacizumab is associated with a lower risk of anaemia and increased risks of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据