4.7 Article

Interleukin-6 in bone metastasis and cancer progression

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1223-1231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.026

关键词

Interleukin-6; Tumor microenvironment; Bone metastasis

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA 084103]
  2. Children's Cancer Research Fund
  3. Children's Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bone and bone marrow are among the most frequent sites of cancer metastasis. It is estimated that 350,000 patients die with bone metastases annually in the United States. The ability of tumor cells to colonize the bone marrow and invade the bone is the result of close interactions between tumor cells and the bone marrow microenvironment. In this article, we review the contribution of interleukin-6 (IL-6) produced in the bone marrow microenvironment to bone metastasis. This cytokine has a strong pro-tumorigenic activity due to its multiple effects on bone metabolism, tumor cell proliferation and survival, angiogenesis, and inflammation. These effects are mediated by several signaling pathways, in particular the Janus kinase/signal transducer and transcription activator (JAK/STAT-3), Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), and phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B/Akt (PkB/Akt), which are activated by IL-6 and amplified in the presence of soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R). Supporting the role of IL-6 in human cancer is the observation of elevated serum levels of IL-6 and sIL-6R in patients with bone metastasis and their association with a poor clinical outcome. Over the last decade several large (monoclonal antibodies) and small (inhibitors of IL-6 mediated signaling) molecules that inhibit IL-6 activity in preclinical models have been developed. Several of these inhibitors are now undergoing phases I and II clinical trials, which will determine their inclusion in the list of effective targeted agents in the fight against cancer. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据